(No) Student Learning: Assignment
✓ Student Learning: Course
✓ Student Learning: Major
(No) Student Learning: Degree
(No) Student Engagement
(No) Student Success
(No) Academic Intimacy/Rapport
(No) Enrollment
(No) Retention
(No) Completion
(No) Graduation
(No) Articulation
(No) Graduates' Career Success
(No) Testing (e.g., GRE, MCAT, LSAT, CAAP, CLA, MAPP)
(No) Other (please describe)
✓ Instruction
(No) Instruction: Games
(No) Instruction: One Shot
(No) Instruction: Course Embedded
(No) Instruction: Self-Paced Tutorials
(No) Reference
(No) Educational Role (other than reference or instruction)
(No) Space, Physical
(No) Discovery (library resources integrated in institutional web and other information portals)
(No) Discovery (library resource guides)
(No) Discovery (from preferred user starting points)
(No) Collections (quality, depth, diversity, format or currency)
(No) Personnel (number and quality)
(No) Other (please describe)
✓ Undergraduate
(No) Graduate
(No) Incoming
(No) Graduating
(No) Pre-College/Developmental/Basic Skills
(No) Other (please describe)
(No) Arts
(No) Humanities
(No) Social Sciences
(No) Natural Sciences (i.e., space, earth, life, chemistry or physics)
(No) Formal Sciences (i.e., computer science, logic, mathematics, statistics or systems science)
✓ Professions/Applied Sciences
(No) English Composition
(No) General Education
(No) Information Literacy Credit Course
(No) Other (please describe)
(No) Assessment Office
(No) Institutional Research
✓ Teaching Faculty
(No) Writing Center
(No) Information/Academic Technology
(No) Student Affairs
(No) Campus Administrator
(No) Library Administrator
✓ Other Librarian
(No) Other (please describe)
✓ Survey
✓ Interviews
(No) Focus Group(s)
(No) Observation
(No) Pre/Post Test
✓ Rubric
(No) Other (please describe)
(No) Student Portfolio
✓ Research Paper/Project
(No) Class Assignment (other than research paper/project)
(No) Other (please describe)
(No) Test Scores
(No) GPA
(No) Degree Completion Rate
(No) Retention Rate
(No) Other (please describe)
Western Michigan University's Academic Affairs Strategic Plan and the forthcoming revision of General Education have explicitly cited information literacy as an integral component to undergraduate education. Professional organizations for health science schools also recognize the need for students to graduate with information literacy competencies in order to succeed in their professions.
The Assessment in Action team consisted of librarians and faculty from the College of Health and Human Services. The librarians were: Dianna Sachs, the Instructional Services Librarian; Linda Rolls, the Health Sciences Librarian; Carrie Leatherman, the Natural Sciences Librarian. The faculty members were Debra Lindstrom (Occupational Therapy) and Doris Ravotas (Interdisciplinary Health Services) who were strong advocates for the importance of information literacy in their students’ education and ability to conduct research as health professionals.
This project sought to compare the impact of a two different information literacy interventions on students’ ability to apply information literacy concepts in advanced research/writing projects. Unfortunately, we were only able to apply one intervention this year. In applying a rubric to analyze students’ research papers we were able to establish a “baseline” and identify the information literacy concepts in which students need additional instruction. Further research will continue next year to compare both information literacy interventions.
This project has raised the profile of information literacy as an important aspect of education and of librarians as information literacy experts. Likewise, there is greater recognition of the library as a unit dedicated to assessment, as evidenced by the team leader being asked to speak on a panel at the WMU Assessment in Action Day.
jAlthough we do not yet have the data to compare the effectiveness of the two information literacy interventions, we did find that students who completed one intervention (the HSV 3650 course) continued to have difficulty with certain information literacy concepts. The course content will be updated to better address these concepts. We are also examining ways to communicate and collaborate better with other CHHS faculty in order to improve the scaffolding of information literacy concepts into other courses.
Given the new, explicit inclusion of information literacy in the forthcoming General Education policies, we expect that our initiatives will serve as models for other departments to integrate assessable information literacy into their curricula. Our plan is to promote assessable information literacy materials that can be accessed asynchronously in an online environment or integrated into other course curricula by faculty in other departments.
Please list any articles published, presentations given, URL of project website, and team leader contact details.
Sachs, D. 2014. “Integrating Information Literacy in the Health Sciences Curriculum: Successful Library/Faculty Collaboration.” Presentation. European Conference on Information Literacy (ECIL). Dubrovnik, Croatia, October 22.
Rolls, L. & Sachs, D. 2014. “I Want You to Want Me! Demonstrating Value by Integrating Information Literacy into the Curriculum.” Presentation. Michigan Library Association Academic Libraries Conference. East Lansing, MI, May 29.
Contact:
Dianna E. Sachs
Associate Professor
Instructional Services Librarian
Waldo Library
Western Michigan University
Kalamazoo, MI 49008
(269) 387-5182
dianna.sachs@wmich.edu